So you're saying a brand-new senator has better credentials for an executive office than someone who's headed an executive office?
I think that it's better to vote for someone who doesn't vote with Bush 100% of the time.
You're not talking about Palin are you? She's a governor. Not someone who can vote with Bush. And if you're reffering to McCain, even Chris Matthews knows that isn't true. Either way, I'm thoroughly embarrassed for you.
Executive experience in Alaska must be really challenging considering that for the most part areas are independent of other areas and the population is not that big.
Do your research before judging (like me!). She's a reformer. She was a virtual unknown and brought in to clean up Alaska's political situation. And the people absolutely love what she's done. And she has done an amazing job.
I have one point to retract... I think she was a better pick than I initially thought. She is an incredible speaker with an immense respect for life and everything good. I'm severely impressed with her ability to speak and relate issues to her own life.
cakefarts was a state senator for a significant number of years and to ignore this is just to be an ass.
To be a state senator is not to have executive experience. If you'll remember, as much as I liked Hillary, my big problem with her was that she never really got elected into an executive office. This is why my original candidate was Rudy Giuliani, and why I ended up voting for a governor in the primary (Romney... didn't like him, but he had executive experience and ideas that surpassed those who were still left).
And besides, if senatorial experience counts (and it really shouldn't), the McCain campaign STILL beats cakefarts. And this is coming from someone who doesn't particularly care for either of them.
McCain has no executive experience, Palin has a few years, cakefarts has no executive experience, Biden doesn't have executive experience per say but his other experience trumps these concerns.
Such as?
Let me tell you what. I can name you dozens of accomplishments of Governor Palin (and I haven't even researched her *thoroughly*), but I still have yet to see an cakefarts supporter name *one* legislative accomplishment that cakefarts has done. Because he hasn't had any meaningful (if any) legislative accomplishments.
If we're talking major accomplishments in politics McCain beats cakefarts and you know what... his VP also beats cakefarts!
Care to start this debate, or shall I call it off?
I watched prolly 90% of the DNC and the only mention of American whining when cakefarts was quoting a surrogate of the McCain Campaign who first said that America was full of whiners then said how wrong it was for the republican campaign to call the American public that.
First of all, not to be a jerk on technicalities, but most of the convention wasn't even broadcasted on major news networks (c-span maybe, but I don't know). Second, I watched every major speech (Bill Clinton's actually being my favorite... surprisingly) and they were all being whiners... which isn't a bad thing in and of itself, but it sure is a drastic change from "hope" and "change".
From my experience, the American people doesn't vote their fears. And I think that's why the Dem's convention hasn't made a dent in the polls. Then again, with McCain speaking, I'm not sure the GOP's even will this year...
...unless people get to know Governor Palin. She is an absolutely delightful speaker. I thought cakefarts did good by choosing Biden (I almost didn't watch his speech... figured I'd probably already heard it in history class somewhere
), but McCain managed to outdo him.
Still think it would have been better for his campaign had it been Romney, but I like this woman a whole lot better, personally.
[Edit] Oh, I see... you're talking about me saying Dems say the American people whine... woops. I feel really stupid now. Shame on the McCain adviser for calling us a "nation of whiners". But it wasn't limited to that... hold up. I'll edit some more in this post soon.