RE: Reply to Future of ZFGC

Vash	RE: Reply to Future of ZFGC « on: December 02, 2007, 11:11:15 pm »
Reputation: +1/-0 Offline Gender: Posts: 3497	This topic is for users to reply to this topic: http://www.zfgc.com/forum/index.php?topic=22327 Logged
Reputation: +1/-0 Offline Gender: Posts: 3497	~The Gaurdians of ZFGC~ Kirby, metallica48423, Max, Vash, walnut100

Moldrill	Re: RE: Reply to Future of ZFGC « Reply #1 on: December 03, 2007, 01:59:16 am »
Reputation: +6/-0 Offline Gender: Posts: 4472	I think the general resources thing is a good idea. At least we are staying with video games. The staff needs to chill out about certain things. I have noticed they edit posts without much good reason. Claiming something is a flame or something. When it's just a joke. Logged

Vash	Re: RE: Reply to Future of ZFGC « Reply #2 on: December 03, 2007, 03:29:15 am »
Reputation: +1/-0 Offline Gender: Posts: 3497	Quote from: Moldrill on December 03, 2007, 01:59:16 am I think the general resources thing is a good idea. At least we are staying with video games. The staff needs to chill out about certain things. I have noticed they edit posts without much good reason. Claiming something is a flame or something. When it's just a joke. Its not a joke if someone complains about it, thats the problem. Logged
Reputation: +1/-0 Offline Gender: Posts: 3497	~The Gaurdians of ZFGC~ Kirby, metallica48423, Max, Vash, walnut100

FISSURE	Re: RE: Reply to Future of ZFGC « Reply #3 on: December 03, 2007, 04:04:18 am »
Reputation: +9/-1 Offline Gender: Posts: 4654	So far it all sounds pretty good. Quote - Develop a wiki conduct/policy. This is definitely a must. Quote - Bring back Snooper Personally i never really looked at the snooper for more then a second or two. Quote - Work better at affiliating the chat and repopulating it. A must if we want to get the chat bigger. Quote - Work on forming a formal Nintendo organization between fan game websites. - Progression/Discussion on pushing for a sister site/affiliated website for independent game development. These two seem a lot harder to bring into zfgc then all of the others. Logged
Reputation: +9/-1 Offline Gender: Posts: 4654

Moldrill

Re: RE: Reply to Future of ZFGC

« Reply #4 on: December 03, 2007, 08:23:01 pm »

Reputation: +6/-0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 4472

Quote from: Andrew on December 03, 2007, 03:29:15 am

Quote from: Moldrill on December 03, 2007, 01:59:16 am
I think the general resources thing is a good idea. At least we are staying with video games.

The staff needs to chill out about certain things. I have noticed they edit posts without much good reason. Claiming something is a flame or something. When it's just a joke.

Its not a joke if someone complains about it, thats the problem.

When I did it nobody complained. :|

Logged

Mamoruanime

@Mamoruanime

Re: RE: Reply to Future of ZFGC

« Reply #5 on: December 03, 2007, 08:28:50 pm »

^Not actually me.
Reputation: +9/-0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 9786

Quote from: Moldrill on December 03, 2007, 08:23:01 pm

Quote from: Andrew on December 03, 2007, 03:29:15 am
Quote from: Moldrill on December 03, 2007, 01:59:16 am
I think the general resources thing is a good idea. At least we are staying with video games.

The staff needs to chill out about certain things. I have noticed they edit posts without much good reason. Claiming something is a flame or something. When it's just a joke.

Its not a joke if someone complains about it, thats the problem.

When I did it nobody complained. :|

O.o how in the world could you possibly know that? lol people tend to use PM as a (smart) way to inform staff of problems :p

But I agree with the concept... The only thing is; I dunno why conduct guidelines would have to be made for the wiki, since as far as I know, its set up for staff-only; unless you mean like staff edit guidelines as well as entry type layouts (to meet quality standards)

Logged

Porkchop	Re: RE: Reply to Future of ZFGC « Reply #6 on: December 03, 2007, 10:05:05 pm »
Super Hero Time! Reputation: +0/-0 Offline Gender: Posts: 4859	Quote - Work on forming a formal Nintendo organization between fan game websites. - Progression/Discussion on pushing for a sister site/affiliated website for independent game development. Hmm... well, there is Indie Game Central ;D « Last Edit: December 03, 2007, 10:08:41 pm by Zidane » Logged
	Quote from: Vash on March 05, 2011, 09:24:21 pm !@#$% I lost my entire post, god dammit.

Mamoruanime @Mamoruanime	Re: RE: Reply to Future of ZFGC « Reply #7 on: December 03, 2007, 10:07:19 pm »
^Not actually me. Reputation: +9/-0 Offline Gender: Posts: 9786	-_-;; please use advertising to plug Zidane lol but its a nice thought Logged

Porkchop	Re: RE: Reply to Future of ZFGC « Reply #8 on: December 03, 2007, 10:08:25 pm »
Super Hero Time! Reputation: +0/-0 Offline Gender: Posts: 4859	Quote from: Mamoruanime on December 03, 2007, 10:07:19 pm -_-;; please use advertising to plug Zidane lol but its a nice thought Actually I wasn't meaning on Advertising I don't even go there anymore I was just showing him actually o_o; My mistake. -removes link- Logged
	Quote from: Vash on March 05, 2011, 09:24:21 pm !@#$% I lost my entire post, god dammit.

Drewdelz

Re: RE: Reply to Future of ZFGC

« Reply #9 on: December 03, 2007, 10:09:09 pm »

Reputation: +0/-0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 1082

Quote from: Zidane on December 03, 2007, 10:05:05 pm

Quote
- Work on forming a formal Nintendo organization between fan game websites.
- Progression/Discussion on pushing for a sister site/affiliated website for independent game development.

Hmm... well, there is Indie Game Central ;D

Actually, SSB: NES' website and forum would make much more sense, since IGC=Indie Game Central.
It would make more sense for ZFGC to be connected to other Nintendo fangaming sites moreso, I think.
And IGC is dead, yet the SSB: NES forums are nearly as active as ZFGC right now, and activity and population will probably be 10x the ammount once the game is released.

http://www.ssbnes.com/

« Last Edit: December 03, 2007, 10:12:33 pm by Drewdelz »

Logged

Nintendo Maniac 64 Not dead, just a lurker	Re: RE: Reply to Future of ZFGC « Reply #10 on: December 06, 2007, 02:16:50 pm »
ニンテンドーマニアック64 Reputation: +0/-0 Offline Posts: 590	You know, isn't it kind of odd that even though we're a gaming-related forum, we don't have a particular game that we commonly play. I'm not sure how to explain this very well, but you could kind of see it how our chat is. It's another place we go hang out at. Though it would be best if it was browser based... One very good example of what I mean is something like JDuno The only problem with that is that you have to download it onto your PC, and since I believe it was made with GameMaker, it'll only work on Windows-based OSes. ...and also I couldn't connect to JDuno's server that last I tried >_> (even though I was able to the first time) Logged
ニンテンドーマニアック64 Reputation: +0/-0 Offline Posts: 590	ZFGC's resident straight-male kuutsundere (because just "tsundere" makes people think of "Shana clones" shivers) Fate/stay night-related and other extended music loops: http://www.youtube.com/user/nintendomaniac64 CPU + iGPU: Pentium G3258 @ 4.6GHz／1.281v RAM: 16GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1600 OS: Windows 7 SP1 x64

Cassyblanca	Re: RE: Reply to Future of ZFGC « Reply #11 on: December 06, 2007, 07:26:13 pm »
Minalien Reputation: +10/-1 Offline Gender: Posts: 2119	Or we COULD keep the chat on IRC, an established and popular internet protocol for chat clients, have people use the web-based PJIRC IRC Client which lo and behold we have on the server, and perhaps have things like JDuno remain what they are; Side-things not related to ZFGC <_<; Logged
Minalien Reputation: +10/-1 Offline Gender: Posts: 2119	Quote There's such a double standard about religion in the modern world. Catholics can gather, wear white robes, and say "In nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus Sancti" and be considered normal. But if my friends and I gather, wear black robes, and say "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn", we're considered cultists.

Krynn	Re: RE: Reply to Future of ZFGC « Reply #12 on: December 07, 2007, 10:10:41 am »
Issac_Amisov Reputation: +0/-0 Offline Gender: Posts: 3458	It honestly doesn't matter to me what happens with the rest of the site, I just want to keep the forum relatively how it is and finish developing the wiki. Logged

Nintendo Maniac 64 Not dead, just a lurker	Re: RE: Reply to Future of ZFGC « Reply #13 on: December 08, 2007, 12:01:05 am »
ニンテンドーマニアック64 Reputation: +0/-0 Offline Posts: 590	Quote from: MiNalien on December 06, 2007, 07:26:13 pm Or we COULD keep the chat on IRC, an established and popular internet protocol for chat clients, have people use the web-based PJIRC IRC Client which lo and behold we have on the server, and perhaps have things like JDuno remain what they are; Side-things not related to ZFGC <_<; I wasn't saying to REMOVE the IRC chat -_-; I was saying that this game idea is more of just another mean of interacting with each-other. AND I wasn't trying to say to use JDuno, I just said a small browser-based game like that with multiplayer would pwn. Logged
ニンテンドーマニアック64 Reputation: +0/-0 Offline Posts: 590	ZFGC's resident straight-male kuutsundere (because just "tsundere" makes people think of "Shana clones" shivers) Fate/stay night-related and other extended music loops: http://www.youtube.com/user/nintendomaniac64 CPU + iGPU: Pentium G3258 @ 4.6GHz／1.281v RAM: 16GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1600 OS: Windows 7 SP1 x64

Author Topic: RE: Reply to Future of ZFGC (Read 3798 times)